|
|||
|
i do apologise for my drunken ramblings- oh gareth please forgive me, mr 90 pints per week?
and since IL-6 has popped up again, it seems constantly elevated levels would be somewhat deleterious: Overexpression of Il6 leads to hyperinsulinaemia, liver inflammation and reduced body weight in mice,Diabetologia. 2008 Apr 24 |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Also, mice studies should be approached with caution when applying the results to humans... Although such models are informative, a recent analysis serves as a reminder that mice are not men... By examining the Mouse Genome Informatics database and the literature, Liao and Zhang identified 120 genes known to be essential for human survival and found that 22% of these are nonessential in mice. In independent studies, Kobuke et al. and Bartoli et al. found that a missense mutation responsible for a specific type of muscular dystrophy in humans (an R77C substitution in alpha-sarcoglycan) caused no disease phenotype when introduced into mice.
__________________
NU_nutrition_TS is a Training and Diet Moderator. |
|
|||
|
the study examined il6 from skeletal muscle, they extrapolated their findings from the mice to suggest :Thus, the pleiotrophic effects of chronically elevated IL-6 levels preclude any obvious usefulness in treating obesity or its associated metabolic complications in man, despite the fact that weight reduction may be expected.
|
|
||||
|
Well I stand by my previous post: you can't always extrapolate mouse data to humans.
Also, would allowing post workout myokines to do their job constitute 'chronic elevations of IL-6' if you only trained 3-4 times per week?
__________________
NU_nutrition_TS is a Training and Diet Moderator. Last edited by NU_nutrition_TS; 01-06-2008 at 10:37 PM. |
|
|||
|
thats a good point Nu, the researchers hardly define chronic (not from the abstract anyway), i should be able to get a copy of the paper from an endo, to see if it alludes to anything further
postulation is the only thing we can work on - unless we can get Hitler and Hess to run ethics committees, they'd sanction a fair few studies |
|
||||
|
Not all studies using mouse models find myokines detrimental:
Quote:
And then to emphasize how mouse models do not always typify human responses: Quote:
Bente Klarlund Pedersen, Thorbjörn C.A. Åkerström, Anders R. Nielsen, Christian P. Fischer J Appl Physiol (March 8, 2007). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00080.2007
__________________
NU_nutrition_TS is a Training and Diet Moderator. |
|
||||
|
I'm not sure if anythings been said about net protein balance in this thread yet? for example although carbohydrates seem to do nothing to increase protein synthesis, they have been shown to impede the breakdown of protein thus improving net protein balance.
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
I posted the following on page 43 which may help answer your query:
Quote:
__________________
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
Yes, I have tackled this question - not sure if it was in this thread though - the answer lies in the cellular mechanism known as chaperone mediated autophagy!
Let's pick that study apart: "The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of ingestion of 100 g of carbohydrates on net muscle protein balance (protein synthesis minus protein breakdown) after resistance exercise." This method of determining 'net muscle protein balance' is a rather 'blunt tool' - it assumes that the 'protein breakdown products' observed are from the recently trained muscle tissue. This is not necessarily the case. There is always a certain proportion of generalized whole body muscle tissue that is specifically laid down to be re-catabolized into amino acids and is part of the amino acid pool. This process is always going on in cycles, even in sedentary individuals, and is largely determined by the protein content of the diet and the body's need for essential amino acids at any given time (for enzyme/hormone synthesis for example). The other source is 'junk proteins' such as 'misfolded' proteins or old and damaged proteins such as the aforementioned enzymes/hormones. These are disposed of by means of chaperone mediated autophagy (CMA). This process is particularly activated when the body is in ketosis - such as after intense resistance exercise. The 'chaperone' cells 'escort' the damaged proteins to special 'compartments' within each cell where they are 'consumed' - hence 'autophagy'; to 'eat oneself'! It is these protein breakdown products that often give the illusion that protein breakdown is greater than protein synthesis and that a person is in negative nitrogen balance when in fact they may still be synthesizing plenty of muscle tissue. But when you consume carbs post workout you stop ketosis dead in its tracks which means less or no CMA. Hence, apparently, more protein synthesis than breakdown and a more positive nitrogen balance. But this does not necessarily mean there is more muscle tissue synthesis going on than in the other scenario! This is why the differences noted were 'minor and delayed'!
__________________
NU_nutrition_TS is a Training and Diet Moderator. Last edited by NU_nutrition_TS; 03-06-2008 at 12:41 PM. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Carbs to Glycogen to Gucose to ATP. Fat to ketones. | hank_marvin | Diet and Nutrition | 25 | 06-12-2006 12:58 AM |
| Pre and Post Workout Nutrition - 3 Parts | Ollie | Diet and Nutrition | 6 | 01-12-2006 03:01 PM |
| Glycogen Stores... | BRUN | Supplements & Formulas | 15 | 28-03-2006 10:20 AM |
| Muscle Glycogen | Poyner | Diet and Nutrition | 6 | 14-03-2006 11:26 PM |